Kosofsky et al v. Byler et al, No. 3:2013cv03020 - Document 62 (W.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT with reasons set forth in 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on October 1, 2014. (src)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kosofsky et al v. Byler et al Doc. 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION DAVID KOSOFSKY and RUSALYN KOSOFSKY vs. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 13-3020 MELVIN BYLER, ANGELA BYLER, and FLYING B RANCH, LLC DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT NOW on this 1st day of October, 2014, for reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of this date, the Court finds that plaintiffs should be awarded judgment declaring: * that defendants have no legal rights, titles or interests in the disputed properties identified as Area 1 and Area 2 of the Court’s said Memorandum Opinion and Order; that defendants’ claims based upon adverse possession, acquiescence and prescriptive easement are without merit; that such claims should be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice; and * that plaintiffs are the legal and rightful owners of the disputed two tracts of real property located in Searcy County, Arkansas –- being Area 1 and Area 2 of Property A as identified in the text of the Memorandum Opinion and Order – and that they are entitled to immediate possession of the same. It is so declared. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ counterclaim based on the theories of boundary line by acquiescence, adverse possession, 1 Dockets.Justia.com and prescriptive easement should be, and hereby is, denied and dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. /S/JIMM LARRY HENDREN JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
