Megonigal v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, No. 3:2011cv03037 - Document 10 (W.D. Ark. 2011)
Court Description: JUDGMENT AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE and adopting the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in toto re 9 . Plaintiff's motion to Dismiss is granted re 8 , and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 20, 2011. (sh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION EARL W. MEGONIGAL v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:11-CV-03037 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT JUDGMENT On May 19, 2011, Plaintiff, Earl W. Megonigal, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g), seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Doc. 1). On November 7, 2011, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff moved to voluntarily dismiss his case. (Doc. 8). Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) filed in this case on November 8, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, regarding Plaintiff s Motion to Dismiss. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The court finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, Plaintiff s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 20th day of December, 2011. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AO72A (Rev. 8/82)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
