Sizemore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, No. 2:2020cv02196 - Document 20 (W.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 19 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 2, 2021. (mjm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sizemore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Case 2:20-cv-02196-BAB Document 20 Doc. 20 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 974 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION HEATHER SIZEMORE vs. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 2:20-cv-02196 COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT JUDGMENT For reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this date, I hereby reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August 2021. Barry A. Bryant /s/ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
