Baars v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, No. 2:2011cv02061 - Document 10 (W.D. Ark. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) as set forth in the 9 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on June 25, 2012. (rw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION RAYMOND W. BAARS V. PLAINTIFF NO. 11-2061 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, we conclude that the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits to the plaintiff is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed and remanded for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney s fees and cost under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED this June 25, 2012. /s/ J. Marschewski HONORABLE JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI Chief United States Magistrate Judge Page -1-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
