Hatton v. Bland et al, No. 5:2019cv00350 - Document 38 (E.D. Ark. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER adopting the 34 proposed findings and recommendations; granting 15 , 29 defendants' motions for summary judgment; and dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/23/2020. (jbh)

Download PDF
Hatton v. Bland et al Doc. 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PHILLIP L. HATTON ADC #121963 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:19-CV-00350 BSM ESTELLA BLAND, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) from United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 34] has been received. After de novo review of the record, the RD is adopted. The defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 15 & 29] are granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice, due to Phillip Hatton’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of March 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.