Cockburn v. Dodson et al, No. 5:2019cv00209 - Document 11 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing plaintiff Matthew Cockburn's complaint without prejudice; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment entered in this case would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/23/2020. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MATTHEW COCKBURN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:19-cv-00209-KGB DUSTY DODSON, Jail Administrator, Dallas County Detention Center, and STAN MCGHEE, Sheriff, Dallas County DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 8). No objections have been filed, and the deadline for filing objections has since passed. After careful consideration, the Court finds no reason to alter or reject Judge Volpe’s recommendations. Therefore, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law (Dkt. No. 8). It is ordered that plaintiff Matthew Cockburn’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Finally, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment entered in this case would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 23rd day of January, 2020. _________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
