Clark v. Davis et al, No. 5:2019cv00176 - Document 13 (E.D. Ark. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 9 the proposed findings and recommendations; and dismissing without prejudice Clark's claims against the Doe defendants. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/30/2019. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Clark v. Davis et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DEONDRICK CLARK ADC #108473 PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 5:19-cv-00176 BSM DAVIS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) from United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 9] has been received. After careful review of the record, the RD is adopted. Clark’s claims against the Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September 2019. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
