Whitney v. Kelly et al, No. 5:2016cv00353 - Document 145 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 116 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Mr. Whitney's 97 Motion for ex parte injunctive relief, which the court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/31/2017. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Whitney v. Kelly et al Doc. 145 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES E. WHITNEY ADC #163817 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:16-cv-00353 KGB/JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 116). Plaintiff James E. Whitney filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 120). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Whitney’s objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety (Dkt. No. 116). It is therefore ordered that Mr. Whitney’s petition for ex parte injunctive relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 97). It is so ordered this 31st day of August, 2017. __________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
