Whitney v. Kelly et al, No. 5:2016cv00353 - Document 101 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER adopting the 36 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety and denying 2 Mr. Whitney's motion for "Ex Parte Injunction" which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Whitney v. Kelly et al Doc. 101 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES E. WHITNEY ADC #163817 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:16-cv-00353 KGB/JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff James E. Whitney filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, but his objections were untimely filed (Dkt. No. 43). However, even if the Court treated Mr. Whitney’s objections as timely filed, after a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Whitney’s objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety (Dkt. No. 36). Therefore, Mr. Whitney’s motion for “Ex Parte Injunction,” which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 2). It is so ordered this 27th day of June, 2017. __________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
