Woolfolk v. Adams, No. 5:2016cv00325 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting the 6 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; constituting this dismissal as a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/4/2017. (mef)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Woolfolk v. Adams Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TRAVIS WOOLFOLK, ADC #143923 v. PLAINTIFF 5:16CV00325-SWW-JTK ADAMS DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA. 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2017. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
