Howell v. Straughn et al, No. 5:2016cv00093 - Document 15 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 13 the Findings and Recommendations in its entirety; and dismissing 1 Mr. Howell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and denying all requested relief. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/20/2016. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Howell v. Straughn et al Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ROBERT E. HOWELL, SR. VS. PETITIONER 5:16-CV-00093-BRW WILLIAM STRAUGHN, SHERLY SHARP, and A. CARPENTER RESPONDENTS ORDER I have received Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris,1 and the objections from Petitioner Robert E. Howell, Sr..2 After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the objection, and a de novo review of the record, I adopt as my findings in all respects the recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Mr. Howell’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED, and all requested relief is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied.3 IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2016. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. No. 13. 2 Doc. No. 14. 3 Petitioner cannot make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
