Muhammad v. King et al, No. 5:2015cv00320 - Document 62 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 61 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 49 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe; and denying 59 plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/15/2016. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Muhammad v. King et al Doc. 62 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD, ADC #96905 PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM AMANDA KING et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“PRD”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. There have been no objections. After a careful consideration, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is denied, defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 49] is granted, and defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July 2016. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
