Holsombach v. Kelley, No. 5:2015cv00310 - Document 26 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects in their entirety; denying all pending motions as moot; and dismissing with prejudice Mr. Holsombach's 10 amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A certificate of appealability is denied. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/01/2016. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Holsombach v. Kelley Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARK A. HOLSOMBACH ADC#134723 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:15-cv-310 KGB/JTK WENDY KELLEY, Director Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 22). Petitioner Mark A. Holsombach filed objections (Dkt. Nos. 23, 24, 25). After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and all of Mr. Holsombach’s objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. All pending motions are denied as moot (Dkt. No. 21). It is therefore ordered that Mr. Holsombach’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice and the requested relief is denied (Dkt. No. 10). A certificate of appealability is denied. So ordered this 1st day of December, 2016. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
