Nichols v. Sanders et al, No. 5:2015cv00260 - Document 19 (E.D. Ark. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 15 proposed findings and recommendations; denying 14 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying 13 second Motion for rehearing; and dismissing Plaintiff's 3 Complaint without prejudice. Should Plaintif f wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400 to the Clerk, within 10 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/28/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
Nichols v. Sanders et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY MACK NICHOLS, JR., ADC #92713 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:15CV00260-JLH-JTK CHARLOTTE SANDERS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Nichols’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED. Document 2. Plaintiff’s second Motion for Rehearing be DENIED. Document #13. 3. Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he be required to submit the statutory #14. filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. 4. Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2015. ________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.