Curtis v. Stanly et al, No. 5:2015cv00206 - Document 11 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: Order adopting 5 partial findings and recommendations in all respects; dismissing Plaintiff Ethan Curtis's claims against defendants Briggs and Lum for failure to state a claim; and directing the Clerk to terminate Briggs and Lum as defendants immediately. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 08/10/2015. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Curtis v. Stanly et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ETHAN CURTIS, ADC #659615 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:15CV00206 BSM CLINT STANLY et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed partial findings and recommendations (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the PRD are adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 Plaintiff Ethan Curtis’s claims against defendants Briggs and Lum are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 2 The clerk is directed to terminate Briggs and Lum as defendants immediately. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of August 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
