McArthur v. Bolden et al, No. 5:2015cv00096 - Document 77 (E.D. Ark. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommendations 74 ; granting 64 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bolden and Thompson are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts and Watson are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/9/16. (tjb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McArthur v. Bolden et al Doc. 77 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION STEVEN LARON MCARTHUR, ADC #95870 VS. PLAINTIFF 5:15CV00096-BRW-JTK KENNIE L. BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations and Plaintiff’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, I adopt the recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bolden and Thompson are DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts, and Watson are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2016. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
