Lewis v. Robinson et al, No. 5:2014cv00457 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Maurice Williams and Justine Minor are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/14/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lewis v. Robinson et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ARRON MICHAEL LEWIS, * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. STANLEY ROBINSON, Captain, Tucker Maximum Security Unit; et al. Defendants. No. 5:14CV00457-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Maurice Williams and Justine Minor are DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of January 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
