Salam v. Via et al, No. 5:2014cv00441 - Document 14 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 7 the proposed partial findings and recommendations; and dismissing without prejudice all claims, other than the failure to protect claim against defendants Via and Mingo, because plaintiff has failed to state claims upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/29/2015. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Salam v. Via et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION AL JABBAR SALAM, ADC #091534 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:14CV00441 BSM JIMMY W. VIA, III, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed partial findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After a careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed partial findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. All claims other than the failure to protect claim against defendants Via and Mingo are dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff has failed to state claims upon which relief may be granted. 2 Defendants Waddle, Jackson, Washington, Cantrell, Thompson, Robinson, Clark, Hobbs, Allen, Baldwin, Andrew, Piggee, Moses Jackson, Iko, Olson, York, Vest, Davenport, Plummer, London, Watson, Price, Pratt, Taylor, Does, Filed, Quinones, Brokes, Higgins, Newton, Hargrave, Davis, Watson, Warren, and Spencer are dismissed without prejudice. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of January 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
