Stickley v. Hobbs, No. 5:2014cv00327 - Document 22 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 21 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects in their entirety. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/13/2015. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stickley v. Hobbs Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES MICHAEL STICKLEY ADC #86725 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:14-cv-00327-SWW-JTK WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). SO ORDERED this 13th day of May 2015. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
