Hutts v. Kelley et al, No. 5:2014cv00269 - Document 78 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 71 77 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; denying Plaintiff James Hutt's 69 motion for injunctive relief; granting defendants' 64 motion for summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Donna Gordon-Buie, Genia Snyder, and Amanda Watt; and dismissing with prejudice defendants Ojibagu Iko, M.D., Connie Hubbard, Jennifer McBride-Andrews, and Deborah York. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2015. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hutts v. Kelley et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES HUTTS, ADC #116478 v. PLAINTIFF 5:14-cv-00269-KGB-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received two Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendations”) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 71, 77). No objections have been filed to either Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has passed. After a review of the Recommendations, this Court adopts them in their entirety. The Court therefore denies plaintiff James Hutts’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 69) and grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 64). This Court dismisses without prejudice defendants Donna Gordon-Buie, Genia Snyder, and Amanda Watt and dismisses with prejudice defendants Ojibagu Iko, M.D., Connie Hubbard, Jennifer McBride-Andrews, and Deborah York. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2015. ______________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Court Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
