Hutts v. Kelley et al, No. 5:2014cv00269 - Document 47 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 8 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety. Plaintiff James Hutts's allegations that he was denied redress through the grievance process in violation of his First Amendment rights is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/04/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
Hutts v. Kelley et al Doc. 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES HUTTS ADC #116473 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00269-KGB-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 14), as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that plaintiff James Hutts’s allegations that he was denied redress through the grievance process in violation of his First Amendment rights is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. SO ORDERED this the 4th day of December, 2014. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.