DeHart v. Rhodes et al, No. 5:2014cv00262 - Document 18 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Ms. DeHart's claims against defendant K. Mayes for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/20/2015. (ljb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DeHart v. Rhodes et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ERIKA N. DEHART v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00262-KGB-JJV RHODES; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 5) and what the Court construes as plaintiff Erika N. DeHart’s objections (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court dismisses without prejudice Ms. DeHart’s claims against defendant K. Mayes for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this the 20th day of May, 2015. ___________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
