Hill v. Iko et al, No. 5:2014cv00239 - Document 17 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Jones are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/15/2014. (jak)
Hill v. Iko et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DANIEL HILL, ADC # 148493 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:14CV00239 JLH-JJV O. Iko; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Jones are DISMISSED without prejudice; 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 15th day of July, 2014. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Terms of Service