Brazell v. Ruh et al, No. 5:2014cv00238 - Document 37 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 11 20 PARTIAL PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 3 motion for preliminary injunction and TRO; denying 10 second motion for TRO; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brazell v. Ruh et al Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL BRAZELL, Jr. ADC #500711 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV A. RUH, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Dispositions (“Recommendations”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. Nos. 11, 20). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is denied (Dkt. No. 3). 2. Plaintiff’s second motion for temporary restraining order is denied (Dkt. No. 10). 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the Recommendations would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this the 14th day of October, 2014. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
