Jackson v. Green et al, No. 5:2014cv00184 - Document 9 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/11/2014. (ks)
Download PDF
Jackson v. Green et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CARL DANIEL JACKSON, ADC #98003 v. PLAINTIFF 5:14CV00184-JLH-JTK ALVA GREEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2014. ______________________________________ James M. Moody Jr. United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com