Clemons v. Summers et al, No. 5:2014cv00171 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations with a note on Clemons's objections. Because Clemons hasn't alleged that he was physically injured, he can't recover in federal court. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/22/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
Clemons v. Summers et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION L.C. CLEMONS ADC # 93134 PLAINTIFF v. No. 5:14-cv-171-DPM-JTK SUMMERS, Correctional Officer II, ADC, Pine Bluff Work Complex; HAYWOOD, Correctional Officer II, ADC, Pine Bluff Work Complex; EARL, COil, ADC, Pine Bluff Work Complex; METCALF, Captain, ADC, Pine Bluff Work Complex; COBBS, Major, ADC, Pine Bluff Work Complex DEFENDANTS ORDER Opposed recommendation, NQ 4, adopted with a note on Clemons's objections. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The situation was regrettable and, as Director Kelley recognized, preventable. NQ 6 at 4. But whether the guards delayed Clemons intentionally or by accident, any Eighth Amendment claim still fails as a matter of law. Because Clemons hasn't alleged that he was physically injured, he can't recover in federal court. 42 U.S.C. ยง 1997e(e). So Ordered. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.