Lovett v. Hobbs, No. 5:2014cv00141 - Document 11 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as to the limitations analysis but declines to reach procedural default or the merits. Lovett's untimely petition for writ of habeas corpus fails. No certificate of Appealability will issue because Lovett has not made a substantial showing that the Constitution was violated in his case. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/28/2014. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lovett v. Hobbs Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ANDREW WAYNE LOVETT ADC #144985 v. PETITIONER No. 5:14-cv-141-DPM RESPONDENT RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, Ng 7, and Lovett's objections and statement of necessity, Ng 10. On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation's limitations analysis, but declines to reach procedural default or the merits. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Lovett's untimely petition for writ of habeas corpus fails. No certificate of appealability will issue because Lovett has not made a substantial showing that the Constitution was violated in his case. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c). So Ordered. t/ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
