Huffstatler v. Kelly et al, No. 5:2014cv00049 - Document 12 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting as clarified 10 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Huffstatler's claims against Kelly, Huff, Shock, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon, Hobbs, and Williams are dismissed. Huffstatler's 1983 claim against King based on alleged verbal abuse is dismissed. An Eighth Amendment claim against King based on the other allegations about him remains. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/21/2014. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Huffstatler v. Kelly et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MATTHEW DAVID HUFFSTATLER ADC # 155080 PLAINTIFF No. 5:14-cv-49-DPM-JTK v. WENDY KELLY, Assistant Director, ADC; KING, Administration, Tucker Unit, ADC; HUFF, RN, Corizon; SHOCK, Doctor, Corizon; PEPPER, Doctor, Corizon; CARSWELL, LPN, CORIZON; ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; CORIZON; RAY HOBBS; and STEVE WILLIAMS DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, NQ 10, adopted as clarified. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Huffstatler' s claims against Kelly, Huff, Shock, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon, Hobbs, and Williams are dismissed. Huffstatler' s § 1983 claim against King based on alleged verbal abuse is dismissed. An Eighth Amendment claim against King based on the other allegations about him remains. So Ordered. #-· ;..!!?YJ..,.d...P D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 21 March 2014 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
