Eldridge et al v. Arkansas County et al, No. 5:2014cv00023 - Document 64 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 63 Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 23, 2015, the Court dismisses with prejudice plaintiffs' claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' remaining state law claims and dismisses without prejudice those claims. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 07/22/2015. (rhm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Eldridge et al v. Arkansas County et al Doc. 64 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION HONORABLE B. PARK ELDRIDGE, JR., individually and in his official capacity; and ASHLEY BROOKE BOYETT, individually and in her official capacity v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 5:14-cv-00023-KGB ARKANSAS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DEWITT, ARKANSAS DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Consistent with the Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 23, 2015, the Court dismisses with prejudice plaintiffs’ claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims and dismisses without prejudice those claims. Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims “shall be tolled while the claim[s] [have been pending] and for a period of 30 days after [they are] dismissed unless State law provides for a longer period.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d). SO ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2015. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
