Rushing v. Hobbs, No. 5:2013cv00306 - Document 13 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner Darnell Rushing has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/25/2014. (ks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rushing v. Hobbs Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DARNELL RUSHING, ADC # 80025 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:13-cv-00306-KGB RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 9). After careful review of the findings and recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner Darnell Rushing has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). SO ORDERED this the 25th day of July, 2014. ___________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
