Hamilton v. Owens et al, No. 5:2013cv00230 - Document 63 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 62 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/29/2014. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hamilton v. Owens et al Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RONALD J. HAMILTON, JR. ADC #133523 * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. RICKY OWENS; et al. Defendants. No. 5:13CV00230-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51) is GRANTED. 2. The Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is dismissed with prejudice. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2014. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
