Holder v. Cashion et al, No. 5:2013cv00229 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 5 the proposed findings and recommendations; and dismissing 4 plaintiff's amended complaint, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order and judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/28/2013. (kdr)

Download PDF
Holder v. Cashion et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LOY HOLDER, ADC #114988 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:13CV00229-BSM MARK CASHION, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and the objections filed by the plaintiff have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s amended complaint [Doc. No. 4] against defendants is dismissed, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order and judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October 2013. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.