Doering v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al, No. 5:2013cv00148 - Document 58 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 57 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting defendants' 48 51 motions for summary judgment; dismissing Plaintiff's 2 complaint with out prejudice with respect to his claims against defendants Corizon Inc., Gaylon Lay and Wendy Kelly and dismissing Plaintiff's 2 complaint with prejudice with respect to his claims against defendant Shaw Richard; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
Doering v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ALAN DOERING ADC #106115 v. PLAINTIFF Case No.: 5:13-cv-00148 KGB/HDY CORIZON INC. et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 57). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are granted (Dkt. Nos. 48, 51). 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to his claims against defendants Corizon Inc., Gaylon Lay, and Wendy Kelley. 3. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice with respect to his claims against defendant Shawn Richard. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED THIS the 14th day of October, 2014. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.