Gray v. Lay et al, No. 5:2013cv00042 - Document 66 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 65 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Motions for Summary Judgment, 55 & 58 , granted. Gray's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/5/2014. (jak)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gray v. Lay et al Doc. 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF RUFUS L. GRAY ADC#141375 v. No. 5:13-cv-42-DPM-JJV GAYLON LAY, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC and ESTELLA MURRAY/BLAND, Nurse, Cummins Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER Unopposed recommendation, N!l 65, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(Advisory Committee Notes to 1983 Addition). Motions for summary I judgment, NQ 55 & 58, granted. Gray's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
