Williams v. Hobbs et al, No. 5:2012cv00457 - Document 69 (E.D. Ark. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 65 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 54 defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing plaintiff Michael Williams's complaint against defendants Frances Johnson and Corey Haynie, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and dismissing Williams's complaint against the remaining defendants, with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/28/2014. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Hobbs et al Doc. 69 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL WILLIAMS, ADC #93995 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:12CV00457 BSM RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney, and the objections filed by the plaintiff, have been reviewed. After careful consideration, and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 54] is granted. Plaintiff Michael Williams’s complaint against defendants Frances Johnson and Corey Haynie is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Williams’s complaint against the remaining defendants is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of February 2014. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
