Newsome v. Hobbs, No. 5:2011cv00316 - Document 14 (E.D. Ark. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Mr. Newsome's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas is DISMISSED with prejudice and the requested relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/8/2012. (dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Newsome v. Hobbs Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WARDELL NEWSOME, II, ADC #136390 v. PETITIONER 5:11cv-00316-JMM-JJV RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record including the state court transcripts, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Petitioner’s arguments are well-founded, the Court cannot say that the state court decision was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Newsome’s § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the requested relief is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2012. _____________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
