Hill v. Rectenwald et al, No. 5:2010cv00030 - Document 65 (E.D. Ark. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 45 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; granting in part 33 Motion to Dismiss with respect the plaintiff's allegations against defendants Kelly, Gibson and White and denying with respect to plaintiff's allegations of failure to protect against defendants Ewell and Hughes. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/28/2010. (thd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hill v. Rectenwald et al Doc. 65 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JESSIE HILL, ADC #104136 v. PLAINTIFF 5:10CV00030JMM/JTK DR. ROBERT RECTENWALD, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Kelley, Gibson, Ewell, Hughes, and White, is GRANTED in part, with respect to plaintiff’s allegations against defendants Kelley, Gibson, and White, and DENIED with respect to plaintiff’s allegations of failure to protect against defendants Ewell and Hughes. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of June, 2010. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
