Wilson v. Payne, No. 4:2022cv00578 - Document 18 (E.D. Ark. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 14 Findings and Recommendations as this court's findings in all respects; and denying a certificate of appealability. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 09/26/2022. (llg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wilson v. Payne Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CHARLES ISAAC WILSON, JR. PETITIONER 4:22-CV-00578 JM/PSH DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (“ADC”) RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. After careful review of those Findings and Recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In habeas cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Dockets.Justia.com Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2022. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
