Martin v. Doe, No. 4:2021cv00693 - Document 9 (E.D. Ark. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing, without prejudice 2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/2023. (ldb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Martin v. Doe Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ESKER MARTIN, III v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:21-cv-00693-KGB-JJV DOE DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 7). Plaintiff Esker Martin, III has not filed any objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Id.). The Court dismisses Mr. Martin’s complaint without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2). The Court also certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 17th day of January, 2023. Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
