Evans v. Ross, No. 4:2020cv01497 - Document 24 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's 2 Complaint without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/3/2021. (ldb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Evans v. Ross Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CORJALON EVANS v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:20-cv-01497-LPR TIERA ROSS, Deputy, Dub Brassell Adult Detention Center DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 22). There have been no objections, and the time for such objections has expired. After a careful and de novo review of the proposed findings and recommendations, as well as the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice due to lack of prosecution. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of November 2021. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
