Garcia v. Does, No. 4:2020cv01164 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Garcia's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and counting this dismissal as a "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/4/2020. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Garcia v. Does Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION VIRGINIA VIDAL GARCIA v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:20-CV-01164-BSM PARKER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“RD”) from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 6] has been received. After carefully reviewing the record, the RD is adopted. Garcia’s amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a “strike,” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2020. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
