Okvath v. Social Security Administration, No. 4:2020cv01108 - Document 15 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 14 Motion to Reverse and Remand be granted; and recommending this case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/21/2021. (ldb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Okvath v. Social Security Administration Doc. 15 Case 4:20-cv-01108-DPM Document 15 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION NICHOL OKVATH vs. Plaintiff Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01108-DPM-JTK KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration Defendant PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS This recommended disposition has been submitted to Chief United States District Judge D.P. Marshall, Jr. T he parties may file specific objections to these findings and recommendations and must provide the factual or legal basis for each objection. The objections must be filed with the Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. A copy must be served on the opposing party. The District Judge, even in the absence of objections, may reject these proposed findings and recommendations in whole or in part. RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion To Reverse and Remand (Doc. No. 14) to the Commissioner (“Defendant”) for further administrative proceedings. Upon examination, it is hereby recommended that this Motion be granted and this case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2021. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
