Kropp v. Higgins et al, No. 4:2020cv00701 - Document 4 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing 1 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 8/7/2020. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kropp v. Higgins et al Doc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JADEN SKY KROPP, #3936-19 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:20-cv-00701-LPR ERIC HIGGINS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received and reviewed Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 3) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. Mr. Kropp did not file an objection to this Recommendation. After careful review of the Recommendation and the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice based on his failure to comply with the Court’s June 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 2) and his failure to prosecute this lawsuit. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of August 2020. _________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
