Jackson v. Higgins et al, No. 4:2020cv00686 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing without prejudice 1 Complaint for failure to prosecute; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 08/14/2020. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. Higgins et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JAMES JACKSON #251009 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:20-cv-686-LPR-JTK ERIC HIGGINS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. (Doc. 5). There have been no objections. After a careful review of the proposed findings and recommendations, as well as of the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August 2020. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
