Carter v. Adams et al, No. 4:2020cv00495 - Document 8 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 7 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing without prejudice 6 Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Order and the accompanying Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 08/14/2020. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carter v. Adams et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MARLO CARTER #174069 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:20-cv-495-LPR-JJV EDWARD ADAMS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 7). There have been no objections. After a careful review of the proposed findings and recommendations, as well as of the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this Order and the accompanying Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August 2020. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
