Sanders v. Gordin et al, No. 4:2020cv00425 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and dismissing without prejudice 1 Plaintiff's Complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 06/04/2020. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sanders v. Gordin et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION JOSEPH DAVID SANDERS #252872 v. PLAINTIFF Case No.: 4:20-cv-00425-LPR-JJV JAMIE GORDIN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 4). There have been no objections. After a careful review of the proposed findings and recommendations, as well as of the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of June 2020. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
