Scott v. District Court of Pine Bluff, No. 4:2020cv00400 - Document 3 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 2 proposed findings and recommendations; not issuing a certificate of appealability; and certifying that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/20/2020. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Scott v. District Court of Pine Bluff Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION NATHANIEL SCOTT v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 4:20-cv-00400-BRW-JTK DISTRICT COURT OF PINE BLUFF RESPONDENT ORDER I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the findings and recommendations and a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the recommendation in all respects. I will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(1)-(2). Accordingly, I certify that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A). IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2020. Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
