London v. Social Security Administration, No. 4:2020cv00346 - Document 20 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 19 Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings be granted. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/16/2021. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
London v. Social Security Administration Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION LATRICYA LONDON, Plaintiff v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI 1, Acting Social Security Commissioner, Defendant Case No. 4:20-cv-00346 DPM-JTK PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS This recommended disposition has been submitted to Chief United States District Judge D. P. Marshall, Jr. The parties may file specific objections to these findings and recommendations and must provide the factual or legal basis for each objection. The objections must be filed with the Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. A copy must be served on the opposing party. The District Judge, even in the absence of objections, may reject these proposed findings and recommendations in whole or in part. RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion To Reverse and Remand (Doc. No. 19) to the Commissioner ("Defendant") for further administrative proceedings. Upon examination of the merits of this case, it is hereby recommended that this Motion be granted and this case be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). SO ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2021. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Kilolo Kijakazi is substituted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 25(d). Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
