Voss v. Lanius et al, No. 4:2019cv00935 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 5 proposed findings and recommendations; and dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Kevin Smith for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 01/23/2020. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Voss v. Lanius et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION RAYMEY VOSS #213751 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:19-cv-00935-LPR-JTK ROBERT LANIUS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. (Doc. 5). There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Kevin Smith is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of January 2020. Lee P. Rudofsky UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
