Lockett v. McClenden, No. 4:2019cv00856 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in their entirety 6 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice 5 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 01/09/2020. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lockett v. McClenden Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CORDARELL LOCKETT v. PLAINTIFF 4:19CV00856-BRW-JTK J. MCCLENDEN DEFENDANT ORDER I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, I adopt them in their entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint against Defendant is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2020. Billy Roy Wilson_________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
